🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, including confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different method for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."