🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.